Next: Visible Elements of
Up: Visibility
Previous: Visibility
Visible Elements of
In [Maz99], Mazur introduced the following definition.
Let be an abelian variety over an arbitrary field .
Definition 1.1
Let
be an embedding of
into an abelian variety
over
.
Then the
visible subgroup of with respect
to the embedding is
The visible subgroup
depends on the choice of
embedding , but we do not include in the notation, as
it is usually clear from context.
The Galois cohomology group has a geometric interpretation
as the group of classes of torsors for (see [LT58]).
To a cohomology class
, there is a corresponding
variety over and a map
that satisfies axioms
similar to those for a simply transitive group action. The set of
equivalence classes of such forms a group, the Weil-Chatelet group
of , which is canonically isomorphic to .
There is a close relationship between visibility and the geometric
interpretation of Galois cohomology. Suppose
is an
embedding and
. We have an exact sequence of
abelian varieties
, where . A piece of
the associated long exact sequence of Galois cohomology is
so there is an exact sequence
|
(1.1) |
Thus there is a point that maps to . The fiber
over is a subvariety of , which, when equipped with its natural
action of , lies in the class of torsors corresponding to .
This is the origin of the terminology ``visible''. Also, we remark
that when is a number field,
is finite
because it is torsion
and is the surjective image of the finitely generated group .
Next: Visible Elements of
Up: Visibility
Previous: Visibility
William A Stein
2002-02-27