First note that the mod representation attached to is irreducible because is semistable and admits no -isogeny (according to [Cre]). The newform attached to is
Consider the elliptic curve defined by . Using Cremona's programs tate and mwrank we find that has conductor , and that . The Tamagawa numbers of at , , and are , , and , respectively. The newform attached to is
Finally, we apply Theorem 3.1 with , , , , and . It is routine to check the hypothesis. For example, the hypothesis that has no -rational -torsion can be checked as follows. Cremona's online tables imply that admits no -isogeny, so is irreducible. Since is isogenous to , the representation is also irreducible, so . Thus, by Theorem 3.1, we have To finish the proof, note that