From luisd@cerber.mat.ub.es  Mon Nov 30 06:37:48 1998
Return-Path: <luisd@cerber.mat.ub.es>
Received: from math.berkeley.edu (math.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.183.94])
	by bmw.autobahn.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id GAA11649
	for <was@autobahn.org>; Mon, 30 Nov 1998 06:37:34 -0800
Received: from cerber.mat.ub.es (cerber.mat.ub.es [161.116.4.1])
	by math.berkeley.edu (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id GAA06418
	for <was@math.berkeley.edu>; Mon, 30 Nov 1998 06:41:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (luisd@localhost)
	by cerber.mat.ub.es (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id PAA21136
	for <was@math.berkeley.edu>; Mon, 30 Nov 1998 15:38:25 +0100 (MET)
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 1998 15:38:25 +0100 (MET)
From: Luis Victor Dieulefait <luisd@mat.ub.es>
To: was@math.berkeley.edu
Subject: newforms
Message-ID: <Pine.HPP.3.96.981130151645.20953A-100000@cerber.mat.ub.es>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Status: RO
X-Status: 

William
     Hello! I'm Luis from the University of Barcelona, we met at the
ABC workshop (Arizona). Kevin Buzzard told me you may help me with
some computations with newforms of high levels. I have visited your
site on the web with tables of hecke polynomials, but I need values for
higher levels, and I don't have linux (for the moment).
     The example I have is a newform of level 8192. The number field 
generated by its coefficients is given by a root of:
x^8 - 24 x^6 + 164 x^4 -240 x^2 +2 , which is  a factor of the
T_3 of this level (please correct if there's some mistake)
(sorry, I forgot to mention that we are in weight 2 and
trivial nebentypus)
This form seems to have an inner twist, and it also seems from the
discussion between you and Kevin that this can be  proved (I have to take
a look at Shimura's book...)
If your algorithm works well for this level, please send me the a_5 and
a_7 of this newform.

One more thing: I've found in your table the T_2, T_3 , and T_5 for level
2048. Can you send me the T_7 and T_11 for this same level?

Up to what level can you compute these Hecke polynomials?
30000 would be too much?

Thank you! 
                   Luis

From luisd@cerber.mat.ub.es  Tue Dec  1 05:54:17 1998
Return-Path: <luisd@cerber.mat.ub.es>
Received: from cerber.mat.ub.es (cerber.mat.ub.es [161.116.4.1])
	by bmw.autobahn.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id FAA08632
	for <was@bmw.autobahn.org>; Tue, 1 Dec 1998 05:54:15 -0800
Received: from localhost (luisd@localhost)
	by cerber.mat.ub.es (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id OAA29226
	for <was@bmw.autobahn.org>; Tue, 1 Dec 1998 14:58:40 +0100 (MET)
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 1998 14:58:39 +0100 (MET)
From: Luis Victor Dieulefait <luisd@mat.ub.es>
To: was@bmw.autobahn.org
Subject: Re: newforms
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96.981130102958.7218H-100000@bmw.autobahn.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.HPP.3.96.981201144613.29083A-100000@cerber.mat.ub.es>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Status: RO
X-Status: A

William
  Thank you very much for your help! I will see wether or not I can manage
to obtain the information I need from the polynomials reduced mod. some
primes, but I guess that combining these reduced polynomials with the
known bounds something can be done.
  I still need some more details. For level 2048 I haven't been able to
find out which are the eigenvalues I need. I'm interested in the newform
whose a_3 is a root of x^4 -20* x^2 + 98 , please send me the a_5,
a_7,...., a_17  of this form.

Regarding level 8192, the form whose a_3 I sent you in the former mail is
new and the degree 8 polynomial whose root is the a_3 is a simple factor
of the new part of the T_3 of level 8192, and this a_3 generates the whole
number field attached to this newform. With this information, theorem
3.64 of Shimura's book and the value of a_3 it follows that this form has
an inner twist given
by the mod 4 character  chi . (I think there is no need to look at the
oldforms because if f is new of level 8192 and f*chi is old, then
(f*chi)*chi=f would be old, thus giving a contradiction. So this form f
has an inner twist.

Thanks again,
                           Luis

From luisd@cerber.mat.ub.es  Wed Dec  2 05:25:54 1998
Return-Path: <luisd@cerber.mat.ub.es>
Received: from cerber.mat.ub.es (cerber.mat.ub.es [161.116.4.1])
	by bmw.autobahn.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id FAA32090
	for <was@bmw.autobahn.org>; Wed, 2 Dec 1998 05:25:29 -0800
Received: from localhost (luisd@localhost)
	by cerber.mat.ub.es (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id OAA05949
	for <was@bmw.autobahn.org>; Wed, 2 Dec 1998 14:29:39 +0100 (MET)
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 1998 14:29:39 +0100 (MET)
From: Luis Victor Dieulefait <luisd@mat.ub.es>
Reply-To: Luis Victor Dieulefait <luisd@mat.ub.es>
To: was@bmw.autobahn.org
Subject: Re: newforms
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96.981201060237.21217J-100000@bmw.autobahn.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.HPP.3.96.981202140335.5784A-100000@cerber.mat.ub.es>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Status: RO
X-Status: 

William,
       The relation between the number field corresponding to f := Q_f
and the subfield fixed by the action of the inner twists:= F_f , 
 gets into the picture of the abelian variety A_f. More precisely:
THe endomorphism algebra of A_f (over Q) is a central simple algebra over
F_f which contains Q_f as a maximal conmutative subfield. Its degree over
Q is [Q_f : Q]*[Q_f : F_f] .

This is proved in : K. Ribet: "Twists of Modular Forms and Endomorphisms
of Abelian VArieties", Math. Ann. 253, 43-62 (1980)

Regarding the coefficient a_5 and a_7 of the form of level 8192 that are
"probably" 0, I think that, for example for the a_5, the upper bound for
the absolute value of it, 2*sqrt(5), proves that it will be 0 when you can
show this mod some primes whose product is greater that (2*sqrt(5))^8 =
160000. The two primes you took are not enough, but if you do the same for
one more prime greater than 25 then it will be enough to get a proof that
a_5 = 0. If you think this argument is correct, please do this computation
with such a prime, say 29.

Regarding modular forms of very big level (more than 30000) I will like to
discuss with you some other time the possibility of doing computations, at
least mod some primes, maybe some previous information I have about the
number field Q_f in some cases can make the computations easier.... 

BEst Regards,
                          Luis
PD: During december when you mail me, please send a copy to
egallese@agatha.unr.edu.ar , I will spend some weeks there.

From luisd@cerber.mat.ub.es  Wed Dec  2 07:16:38 1998
Return-Path: <luisd@cerber.mat.ub.es>
Received: from cerber.mat.ub.es (cerber.mat.ub.es [161.116.4.1])
	by bmw.autobahn.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id HAA02553
	for <was@bmw.autobahn.org>; Wed, 2 Dec 1998 07:07:44 -0800
Received: from localhost (luisd@localhost)
	by cerber.mat.ub.es (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id QAA06895
	for <was@bmw.autobahn.org>; Wed, 2 Dec 1998 16:12:00 +0100 (MET)
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 1998 16:12:00 +0100 (MET)
From: Luis Victor Dieulefait <luisd@mat.ub.es>
To: was@bmw.autobahn.org
Subject: Re: newforms
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96.981201060237.21217J-100000@bmw.autobahn.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.HPP.3.96.981202160510.6859A-100000@cerber.mat.ub.es>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Status: RO
X-Status: 

William,
   As a matter of fact, I can prove already that a_5=0 for the newform of
level 8192, because we can use the fact that this form has an inner
twist given by the mod 4 character to see that a_5 belongs to F_f, the
subfield of Q_f fixed by the automorphism giving the inner twist.
The field F_f has degree 4, so that taking norms we get from the fact
that the abs. value of a_5 is bounded by 2*sqrt(5) that its norm is
smaller than 400. Then with the minimal polynomial mod p you computed
for those two primes it's enough to conclude that the norm of a_5, and
the a_5, is 0, becouse the product of the 2 primes is bigger that 400.
For the a_7, more computation would be needed (the twist is no longer
useful). Are you convinced with this proof that a_5=0 ?
Regards,
         Luis


From luisd@cerber.mat.ub.es  Fri Dec  4 05:59:45 1998
Return-Path: <luisd@cerber.mat.ub.es>
Received: from cerber.mat.ub.es (cerber.mat.ub.es [161.116.4.1])
	by bmw.autobahn.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id FAA06251
	for <was@bmw.autobahn.org>; Fri, 4 Dec 1998 05:58:53 -0800
Received: from localhost (luisd@localhost)
	by cerber.mat.ub.es (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id OAA22548
	for <was@bmw.autobahn.org>; Fri, 4 Dec 1998 14:48:03 +0100 (MET)
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 1998 14:48:03 +0100 (MET)
From: Luis Victor Dieulefait <luisd@mat.ub.es>
To: was@bmw.autobahn.org
Subject: Re: newforms
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96.981201060237.21217J-100000@bmw.autobahn.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.HPP.3.96.981204143428.22490A-100000@cerber.mat.ub.es>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Status: RO
X-Status: 

William,
   I have just realize that in the 2 examples of newforms of level 2048
and 8192, we can prove (using theorem 3.64 of Shimura's book) that the 2
characters: chi: (Z/4Z)* -->{+-1} and
psi: (Z/8Z)* -->{+-1} give the inner twist: chi*f = psi*f = f^(gamma),
where gamma is the "real conjugation": a_3 --> - a_3 , of Q_f. (this
automorphism has F_f = Q((a_3)^2) as its fixed field) 
  From this it follows that (in the 2 examples):
                  a_p = 0 for every p congruent to 5 or 7 (mod 8)

(Proof: take p congruent to 5 mod 8. If a_p is not 0, chi(p)=1 implies
that a_p belongs to F_f;  psi(p)= -1 implies that a_p doesn't belong to
F_f. Then  a_p =0  )

In particular, in the example of level 8192, this proves that a_3 = a_5 =
a_13 = 0 , as suggested by the computations you have done.  

           Luis

From luisd@cerber.mat.ub.es Tue Jan 19 07:27:02 1999
Received: from bmw.autobahn.org (bmw.autobahn.org [206.79.223.28])
	by math.berkeley.edu (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id HAA29168
	for <was@math.berkeley.edu>; Tue, 19 Jan 1999 07:26:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cerber.mat.ub.es (cerber.mat.ub.es [161.116.4.1])
	by bmw.autobahn.org (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id HAA12862
	for <was@bmw.autobahn.org>; Tue, 19 Jan 1999 07:28:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (luisd@localhost)
	by cerber.mat.ub.es (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id QAA26507
	for <was@bmw.autobahn.org>; Tue, 19 Jan 1999 16:24:57 +0100 (MET)
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 16:24:57 +0100 (MET)
From: Luis Victor Dieulefait <luisd@mat.ub.es>
To: was@bmw.autobahn.org
Subject: Re: newforms
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96.981130102958.7218H-100000@bmw.autobahn.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.HPP.3.96.990119160147.26100A-100000@cerber.mat.ub.es>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Status: RO
X-Status: A

William,
    So it seems that the examples of newforms we were working on have CM.
I think that the argument of Shimura I thought was contradictory with this
fact can only be used with odd primes in the level, but in the case of the
power of 2 level I can't say nothing about CM (I mean "a priori").
     I want examples similar to the ones we were working on , but without
CM. I have a few candidates to check.
     Can you send me the fourier expansion of the level 1024 newforms
corresponding to the following factor of the characteristic polynomial of
the T_3:   (x^4-8*x^2+8)^2
Maybe we are lucky in this example and the forms don't have CM. The fact
that the factor appears with mult. 2 makes posible that the form has one
(and only one!) twist. With a few more coefficients I think this can be
checked.
     If this example doesn't work, a good place to look at is the space
of newforms with level 3*1024 = 3072, where CM can not occur.

In the case of level 8192, remember that there was another newform whose
corresp. number field was of degree 8 (the a_3 is in fact the square root
of an element belonging to the maximal real subfiel of the cyclotomic
field of the 16-th roots of unity). Computing its a_p modulo some random
prime, does this form also seem to have CM ??
    
 By the way, your site in the internet is unreachable these days, do you
have any idea of what can be the problem?
Thank you a lot! Best wishes,
                                     Luis
PS: If you can,please send me the results of the computations this week, 
because I have a congress starting this sunday and it will be great if I
have this results before leaving.


From luisd@cerber.mat.ub.es Tue Jan 19 08:08:46 1999
Received: from cerber.mat.ub.es (cerber.mat.ub.es [161.116.4.1])
	by math.berkeley.edu (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id IAA00603
	for <was@math.berkeley.edu>; Tue, 19 Jan 1999 08:08:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (luisd@localhost)
	by cerber.mat.ub.es (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id RAA27137
	for <was@math.berkeley.edu>; Tue, 19 Jan 1999 17:07:50 +0100 (MET)
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 17:07:49 +0100 (MET)
From: Luis Victor Dieulefait <luisd@mat.ub.es>
To: William Arthur Stein <was@math.berkeley.edu>
Subject: Re: newforms
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.3.96.990119074201.11451A-100000@faema.math.berkeley.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.HPP.3.96.990119170141.26759A-100000@cerber.mat.ub.es>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Status: RO
X-Status: 

William,
           
In case it helps you, here's the polynomial giving the a_3  of the level
8192 newform whose coefficients I've asked you to compute: 
 578 -624*x^2 + 196*x^4 - 24*x^6 + x^8
I'm reaching your site (with the new address you gave me) without
problems. Thanks again, best regards,
                                           Luis


