In this section we will learn about rings of algebraic integers and
discuss some of their properties. We will prove that the ring of
integers
of a number field is noetherian.
Fix an algebraic closure
of
. Thus
is an infinite
field extension of
with the property that every polynomial
splits as a product of linear factors in
. One
choice of
is the subfield of the complex numbers
generated by all roots in
of all polynomials with coefficients
in
. Note that any two choices of
are isomorphic, but there will
be many isomorphisms between them.
An algebraic integer is an element of
.
Definition 2.3.1 (Algebraic Integer)
An element

is an
algebraic integer if it is a
root of some monic polynomial with coefficients in

.
For example,
is an algebraic integer, since it is a root
of
, but one can prove
is not an algebraic integer, since one can show that
it is not the root of any monic polynomial over
.
Also
and
are not algebraic numbers (they are
transcendental).
Example 2.3.2
We compute some minimal polynomials in
SAGE.
The minimal polynomial of

:
sage: (1/2).minpoly()
x - 1/2
We construct a root

of

and compute its minimal polynomial:
sage: k.<a> = NumberField(x^2 - 2)
sage: a^2 - 2
0
sage: a.charpoly()
x^2 - 2
Finally we compute the minimal polynomial of

, which
is not integral:
sage: (a/2 + 3).charpoly()
x^2 - 6*x + 17/2
The only elements of
that are algebraic integers are the usual
integers
. However, there are elements of
that have
denominators when written down, but are still algebraic integers. For example,
is an algebraic integer, since it is a root of the monic
polynomial
. We verify this using SAGE below,
though of course this is easy to do by hand (you should try
much more complicated examples in SAGE).
sage: k.<a> = QuadraticField(5)
sage: a^2
5
sage: alpha = (1 + a)/2
sage: alpha.charpoly()
x^2 - x - 1
sage: alpha.is_integral()
True
Definition 2.3.3 (Minimal Polynomial)
The
minimal polynomial of

is the monic polynomial
![$ f\in\mathbf{Q}[x]$](img246.png)
of least positive degree such that

.
It is a consequence of Lemma 2.3.5 that
the minimal polynomial
is unique.
The minimal polynomial of
is
, and
the minimal polynomial of
is
.
Example 2.3.4
We compute the minimal polynomial of a number expressed
in terms of
![$ \sqrt[4]{2}$](img261.png)
:
sage: k.<a> = NumberField(x^4 - 2)
sage: a^4
2
sage: (a^2 + 3).minpoly()
x^2 - 6*x + 7
Lemma 2.3.5
Suppose
. Then the minimal polynomial of
divides any polynomial
such that
.
Proof.
Let

be a minimal polynomial of

. If

, use
the division algorithm to write

, where

. We have
so

is a root of

. However,

is the monic
polynomial of least positive degree with root

, so

.
Lemma 2.3.6
If
is an algebraic integer, then the minimal polynomial
of
has coefficients in
.
Proof.
Suppose
![$ f\in\mathbf{Q}[x]$](img246.png)
is the minimal polynomial of

.
Since

is an algebraic integer, there is a polynomial
![$ g\in\mathbf{Z}[x]$](img267.png)
that is monic such that

.
By Lemma
2.3.5, we have

, for some monic
![$ h\in\mathbf{Q}[x]$](img270.png)
. If
![$ f\not\in\mathbf{Z}[x]$](img271.png)
, then some prime

divides the denominator of some coefficient of

. Let

be the
largest power of

that divides some denominator of some
coefficient

, and likewise let

be the largest power of

that divides some denominator of a coefficient of

. Then

, and if we reduce both sides modulo

, then the
left hand side is
0 but the right hand side is a product of two
nonzero polynomials in
![$ \mathbf{F}_p[x]$](img275.png)
, hence nonzero, a contradiction.
Proposition 2.3.7
An element
is integral if and only if
is
finitely generated as a
-module.
Proof.
Suppose

is integral and let
![$ f\in\mathbf{Z}[x]$](img277.png)
be the monic minimal polynomial
of

(that
![$ f\in\mathbf{Z}[x]$](img277.png)
is Lemma
2.3.6). Then
![$ \mathbf{Z}[\alpha]$](img276.png)
is generated by

, where

is
the degree of

. Conversely, suppose

is such that
![$ \mathbf{Z}[\alpha]$](img276.png)
is finitely generated, say by elements

. Let

be any integer bigger
than the degrees of all

. Then there exist integers

such
that

, hence

satisfies
the monic polynomial
![$ x^d - \sum_{i=1}^n a_i f_i(x) \in \mathbf{Z}[x]$](img281.png)
, so

is integral.
Example 2.3.8
The rational number

is not integral. Note that
![$ G=\mathbf{Z}[1/2]$](img283.png)
is not a finitely generated

-module, since

is infinite
and

. (You can see that

implies that

is not finitely
generated, by assuming that

is finitely generated, using the structure
theorem to write

as a product of cyclic groups, and noting that

has nontrivial

-torsion.)
Proposition 2.3.9
The set
of all algebraic integers is a ring, i.e., the sum and
product of two algebraic integers is again an algebraic integer.
Proof.
Suppose

, and let

be the degrees of the
minimal polynomials of

, respectively. Then

span
![$ \mathbf{Z}[\alpha]$](img276.png)
and

span
![$ \mathbf{Z}[\beta]$](img291.png)
as

-module. Thus
the elements

for

span
![$ \mathbf{Z}[\alpha, \beta]$](img294.png)
. Since
![$ \mathbf{Z}[\alpha + \beta]$](img295.png)
is a submodule of the
finitely-generated module
![$ \mathbf{Z}[\alpha, \beta]$](img294.png)
, it is finitely
generated, so

is integral. Likewise,
![$ \mathbf{Z}[\alpha\beta]$](img297.png)
is a submodule of
![$ \mathbf{Z}[\alpha, \beta]$](img294.png)
, so it is also finitely
generated and

is integral.
Example 2.3.10
We illustrate an example of a sum and product of two algebraic
integers being an algebraic integer. We first make the relative number
field obtained by adjoining a root of

to the field

:
sage: k.<a, b> = NumberField([x^2 - 2, x^3 - 5])
sage: k
Number Field in a with defining polynomial x^2 + -2 over its base field
Here
and
are roots of
and
, respectively.
sage: a^2
2
sage: b^3
5
We compute the minimal polynomial of the sum and product of
and
. The command absolute_minpoly
gives the minimal polynomial of the element over the rational numbers.
sage: (a+b).absolute_minpoly()
x^6 - 6*x^4 - 10*x^3 + 12*x^2 - 60*x + 17
sage: (a*b).absolute_minpoly()
x^6 - 200
Of course the minimal polynomial of the product is
![$ \sqrt[3]{5}
\sqrt{2}$](img302.png)
is trivial to compute by hand. The minimal polynomial of
![$ \alpha = \sqrt[3]{5} + \sqrt{2}$](img303.png)
could be computed by hand by
computing the determinant of the matrix given by left multiplication
of

on this basis:
The following is an alternative more symbolic way to compute the
minimal polynomials above, though it is not provably correct. We
compute
to 100 bits precision (via the n command), then
use the LLL algorithm (via the algdep command) to heuristically
find a linear relation between the first
powers of
.
sage: a = 5^(1/3); b = sqrt(2)
sage: c = a+b; c
5^(1/3) + sqrt(2)
sage: (a+b).n(100).algdep(6)
x^6 - 6*x^4 - 10*x^3 + 12*x^2 - 60*x + 17
sage: (a*b).n(100).algdep(6)
x^6 - 200
Definition 2.3.11 (Number field)
A
number field is a field

that contains the rational
numbers

such that the degree
![$ [K:\mathbf{Q}] = \dim_\mathbf{Q}(K)$](img306.png)
is finite.
If
is a number field, then by the primitive
element theorem there is an
so that
.
Let
be the minimal polynomial of
.
For any fixed choice of
, there is some
such that
. The map
that sends
to
defines an embedding
.
Thus any number field can be embedded (in
possible ways)
in any fixed choice
of an algebraic closure of
.
Definition 2.3.12 (Ring of Integers)
The
ring of integers of a number field

is the ring

$x$ satisfies a monic polynomial with integer coefficients
Note that
is a ring, because
if we fix an embedding of
into
, then
The field
of rational numbers is a number field of degree
,
and the ring of integers of
is
. The field
of
Gaussian integers has degree
and
. The field
has ring of integers
.
Note that the Golden ratio
satisfies
.
The ring of integers of
is
, where
.
Definition 2.3.13 (Order)
An
order in

is any subring

of

such that the
quotient

of abelian groups is finite.
(Note that

must contain

because it is a ring, and for us
every ring has a

.)
As noted above,
is the ring of integers of
. For every
nonzero integer
, the subring
of
is an order.
The subring
of
is not an order, because
does not
have finite index in
. Also the subgroup
of
is not an order because it is not a ring.
We define the number field
and compute its
ring of integers, which has discriminant
.
sage: K.<i> = NumberField(x^2 + 1)
sage: OK = K.ring_of_integers(); OK
Order with module basis 1, i in Number Field in i with
defining polynomial x^2 + 1
sage: OK.discriminant()
-4
Next we compute the order
.
sage: O3 = K.order(3*i); O3
Order with module basis 1, 3*i in Number Field in i with
defining polynomial x^2 + 1
sage: O3.gens()
[1, 3*i]
Notice that the distriminant is
:
sage: O3.discriminant()
-36
We test whether certain elements are in the order.
sage: 5 + 9*i in O3
True
sage: 1 + 2*i in O3
False
We will frequently consider orders because they are often much easier
to write down explicitly than
. For example, if
and
is an algebraic integer, then
is an order in
, but frequently
.
Example 2.3.14
In this example
![$ [\O_K : \mathbf{Z}[a]] = 2197$](img336.png)
. First we define
the number field

where

is a root of

,
then we compute the order
![$ \mathbf{Z}[a]$](img339.png)
generated by

.
sage: K.<a> = NumberField(x^3 - 15*x^2 - 94*x - 3674)
sage: Oa = K.order(a); Oa
Order with module basis 1, a, a^2 in Number Field in a with defining
polynomial x^3 - 15*x^2 - 94*x - 3674
Next we compute the maximal order
of
with a basis, and
compute that the index of
in
is
.
sage: OK = K.maximal_order()
sage: OK.basis()
[25/169*a^2 + 10/169*a + 1/169, 5/13*a^2 + 1/13*a, a^2]
sage: Oa.index_in(OK)
2197
Lemma 2.3.15
Let
be the ring of integers of a number field. Then
and
.
Proof.
Suppose

with

in lowest
terms and

. Since

is integral,
![$ \mathbf{Z}[a/b]$](img346.png)
is finitely
generated as a module, so

(see Example
2.3.8).
To prove that
, suppose
, and let
be the minimal monic polynomial of
. For any
positive integer
, the minimal monic polynomial of
is
, i.e., the polynomial obtained from
by
multiplying the coefficient of
by
, multiplying the
coefficient of
by
, multiplying the coefficient of
by
, etc. If
is the least common multiple of
the denominators of the coefficients of
, then the minimal monic
polynomial of
has integer coefficients, so
is
integral and
. This proves that
.
William Stein
2012-09-24