Aly Deines: Tons of little issues that nead to be fixed; but I learned
something.  Deep.

Amy Supple: Solid. Very polished compared to others.  Almost nothing
bad.  She quickly fixed any remaining issues. 

Simon Spicer: Some major issues with writing and papers.  Very
interesting algorithm.  Original research.  Quite impressive that he
got it all to really work!   Nice worksheet too. 

Stephen Mckeown: Pretty clean and straightforward.  Short.  Very good
use of references.  Somewhat awkward about how to use math
terminology.  Good project though, and nice choice of topic, which
really was hard for him to narrow in on.

Wenhan Wang: Clearly an A+ paper.  Waiting for him to update it based
on my extensive notes.  He put some good original time into working
out the details of some of the claims in other papers.

Bharathwaj Palvannan:

Chad Klumb:

Matthew Ward:

Yannick Van Heule: